PEG Ratio Calculator
Your PEG Ratio Result
This is the Price/Earnings to Growth ratio
PEG = P/E ÷ Expected Growth Rate (%)
How to Interpret Your PEG
- PEG < 1.0 Undervalued: Growth is likely priced in below current earnings
- 1.0 ≤ PEG ≤ 2.0 Fairly valued: Growth is priced in with reasonable expectations
- PEG > 2.0 Potentially overvalued: Growth expectations may be too optimistic
Note: These are general guidelines. Always compare to industry averages and consider other factors like risk and cash flow.
When you see a stock trading at a P/E ratio of 60, your first thought might be: that’s crazy expensive. But what if that company is growing its earnings 30% a year? Suddenly, that 60 doesn’t look so wild. This is where the P/E ratio falls short-and why smart investors turn to the PEG ratio.
What the P/E Ratio Really Tells You (and What It Doesn’t)
The price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is simple: divide a stock’s price by its earnings per share. If a company’s stock is $120 and it earned $4 per share last year, its P/E is 30. That means you’re paying $30 for every $1 of profit the company made. It sounds straightforward, but here’s the problem: the P/E ratio only looks backward. It uses past earnings. That’s fine for a utility company that’s been making the same $2 per share for ten years. But what about a tech startup that made $0.50 last year but is expected to make $2 next year? Its P/E might look sky-high-say, 120-but that number doesn’t reflect the growth coming. That’s why you can’t judge a growth stock by P/E alone. A company with a P/E of 50 might be overpriced… or it might be the next Amazon. Without context on future earnings, you’re flying blind.Enter the PEG Ratio: The Growth Adjustment
The PEG ratio fixes that blind spot. It takes the P/E ratio and divides it by the company’s expected earnings growth rate. The formula is simple:PEG = P/E ÷ Annual Earnings Growth Rate (%)
Let’s say a stock has a P/E of 40 and analysts expect earnings to grow 40% next year. Its PEG is 1.0. That’s considered fair value. Now take another stock with the same P/E of 40, but only 10% growth. Its PEG is 4.0. That’s expensive-even if the P/E looks the same. The genius of the PEG ratio is that it forces you to ask: Is the price justified by how fast the company is growing? A high P/E isn’t automatically bad. A low P/E isn’t automatically good. The PEG ratio cuts through the noise.Real-World Examples: P/E vs PEG in Action
Take Microsoft in 2025. Its stock trades at $420. Earnings per share last year were $12, giving it a P/E of 35. But analysts expect earnings to grow 35% this year. That means its PEG is exactly 1.0. That’s not overvalued-it’s priced for its growth. Now compare it to a mature retailer with a P/E of 18. Its earnings are only growing 3% a year. Its PEG is 6.0. That’s expensive for a slow-grower. The low P/E makes it look cheap, but the PEG reveals the truth: you’re paying a premium for almost no growth. Here’s another case: a biotech firm with a P/E of 80. At first glance, it looks insane. But if its earnings are projected to jump 80% next year thanks to a new drug approval, the PEG is 1.0 again. That’s not a bubble-it’s a bet on future cash flow.The PEG ratio doesn’t lie. It just makes you do the math.
When the PEG Ratio Fails You
The PEG ratio isn’t magic. It has serious flaws-and if you use it blindly, you’ll get burned. First, it depends entirely on growth estimates. Analysts are often wrong. They get too excited during bull markets and too pessimistic during downturns. If you use a 50% growth forecast that turns out to be 20%, your PEG of 1.0 becomes a PEG of 2.5-and you’re overpaying. Second, it’s useless for companies with no growth. Think utilities, banks, or consumer staples. A company growing at 2% with a P/E of 15 has a PEG of 7.5. That doesn’t mean it’s a bad stock-it just means the PEG ratio isn’t the right tool. For those, you’re better off looking at dividend yield or price-to-book. Third, it ignores risk. Two companies can have the same PEG, but one might be in a volatile industry with high debt. The PEG doesn’t tell you that. You still need to check balance sheets, cash flow, and competitive moats. The PEG ratio is a filter-not a final answer.What’s a Good PEG Ratio?
There’s no universal number, but here’s what most investors use as a guide:- PEG below 1.0: The stock may be undervalued relative to its growth. This is where Peter Lynch looked for opportunities.
- PEG between 1.0 and 2.0: Fairly valued. Growth is priced in.
- PEG above 2.0: Potentially overvalued. Be cautious unless growth is extremely reliable.
How to Use P/E and PEG Together
Don’t pick one and ignore the other. Use them as a pair. Start with P/E to screen. Filter out stocks with P/E over 50 if you’re conservative, or over 30 if you’re focused on growth. Then apply PEG to the survivors. Here’s a simple workflow:- Find companies with strong earnings growth (15%+ annual).
- Calculate their P/E (use forward P/E, not trailing).
- Find consensus earnings growth estimates from 2-3 reputable sources (Morningstar, Bloomberg, or FactSet).
- Divide P/E by growth rate to get PEG.
- Compare PEG to industry peers.
- Check cash flow and debt before buying.
What’s Next? Beyond PEG
The PEG ratio is a step up from P/E, but it’s still basic. Some investors have built on it:- PEGY Ratio: Adds dividend yield to the equation. Useful for mature growth companies like Coca-Cola or Johnson & Johnson that pay dividends while still growing.
- EV/EBITDA: Looks at enterprise value instead of market cap, and uses earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. Better for capital-heavy businesses.
- Free Cash Flow Yield: Measures cash generated vs. stock price. More reliable than earnings, which can be manipulated.
Final Thought: Growth Isn’t Free
The market rewards growth-but it also punishes overpayment. A stock with a 50% growth rate and a P/E of 200 might seem amazing. But its PEG is 4.0. That’s not a bargain. That’s a gamble. The best growth stocks aren’t the ones with the highest P/E. They’re the ones where the PEG tells you the price is in line with the future. That’s the real edge.Is a low P/E ratio always better than a high one?
No. A low P/E might mean a company is undervalued-or it could mean investors expect its earnings to shrink. A high P/E might signal overvaluation-or it could reflect strong future growth. The PEG ratio helps you tell the difference by factoring in earnings growth.
Can the PEG ratio be used for dividend stocks?
It can, but it’s not ideal. The PEG ratio ignores dividends, which are a key part of total return for mature companies. For dividend-paying growth stocks, consider the PEGY ratio, which adds dividend yield to the calculation. It gives a fuller picture of value.
Why do some analysts say PEG is unreliable?
Because it depends on earnings growth forecasts, which are often wrong. Analysts get overly optimistic during bull markets and overly pessimistic during downturns. If you use a 30% growth estimate that turns out to be 10%, your PEG of 1.5 becomes a PEG of 4.5-and you’ve overpaid. Always check multiple sources and be skeptical of projections.
Should I use trailing P/E or forward P/E for PEG?
Always use forward P/E. The PEG ratio is designed to value future growth, so it needs forward-looking earnings, not past ones. Trailing P/E will mislead you on growth stocks because it doesn’t reflect what’s coming next.
What’s the best way to find reliable growth estimates?
Use consensus estimates from platforms like Bloomberg, FactSet, or Morningstar. Avoid relying on a single analyst’s forecast. Look for the average of 5-10 estimates. The more agreement among analysts, the more reliable the number.
Is PEG useful for small-cap or startup stocks?
Be careful. Small-cap and startup stocks often have volatile or unpredictable earnings. Their growth projections can be wildly speculative. PEG can give a false sense of security. For these stocks, focus on revenue growth, market size, and cash burn rate before even looking at PEG.
Crystal Jedynak
I'm a fintech content strategist and newsletter writer who focuses on practical online investing for everyday investors. I turn complex platforms and market tools into clear, actionable guidance, and I share transparent case studies from my own portfolio experiments.
view all postsWrite a comment